|
'The weight of
evidence indicates that, within their areas of competence, Certified
Nurse Midwives (CNM) provide care whose quality is equivalent
to that of care provided by physicians. Moreover, CNM's
are more adept that physicians at providing services that depend
on communication with patients and preventive actions" - US Congress, Office of Technology
Assessment, 1986
Recent research has
also focused on the effectiveness of the routine interventions
that nurse-midwives try to avoid. A 1985 review in the
Journal of Nurse-Midwifery of all studies on postdate pregnancies,
for instance, found no evidence that outcomes for mother or baby
were better when labor was automatically induced because the
fetus had reached a predetermined gestational age.
In 1985, a study published
in the journal Birth compared women who received epidural anesthesia
with those who used other pain relief or no medication al all.
The study found that women who received epidural anesthesia had
longer labors, needed pitocin, more frequently to augment labor,
had a higher incidence of forceps deliveries and more bladder
catherizations. Two years later a study in the same journal
found that among 70 women questioned, only 27 percent said the
experience of labor matched their expectations. Their most
frequent surprise, getting less pain relief that expected from
medication.
During the 1980's numerous
studies looked into whether continuous electronic fetal monitoring
truly had the expected benefits over checks of the baby's heartbeat
with a fetoscope at regular intervals. The author of a
1990 editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine summarized
studies of continuous electronic fetal monitoring and concluded
the answer was no.
"Clearly the hoped
for benefit from intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring has
not been realized," Dr. Roger Freeman of Memorial Medical
Center in Long Beach, California wrote, "It is unfortunate
that randomized, controlled trials were not carried out before
this form of technology became universally applied... The
story of electronic fetal monitoring also illustrates the need
for proper randomized clinical trials before new forms of practice
with out clearly demonstrated benefit."
Traditional reasons
for doing an episiotomies have been to avoid a dangerous tear
for the mother and to limit trauma for the infant. A 1981
study in the Journal of Nurse-Midwifery, however, showed that
five minute Apgar scores were not notably different when the
head was delivered slowly over an intact perineum.
|